ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic value of anion gap for patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Association of inflammatory indicators with intensive care unit mortality in critically ill patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Trial
- Multicenter machine learning model for assessing the impact of malignancy on in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients: a clinical decision support system with interpretable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association between the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and 28-day all-cause mortality in sepsis-associated delirium patients: a retrospective study and machine learning.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Real-time monitoring of in-hospital mortality risk in intensive care units heart failure patients using an extreme gradient boosting model.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2026Article
- Metabolic dynamic score and machine learning: a novel approach to predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Factors associated with psychological distress among family caregivers of preschool children with autism: an analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an explainable machine learning model for in-hospital mortality risk stratification in intensive care unit patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model Integrating Electrocardiographic and Acute Physiology Metrics for Mortality Prediction in Critical Ill Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine-learning model based on dynamic tumor markers in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Cyclic dual latent discovery for improved blood glucose prediction through patient-provider interaction modeling: a prediction study.Ewha medical journal · 2025Article
- A Novel Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Acute Heart Failure in Intensive Care Unit Patients with COPD.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Multimodal deep learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients using longitudinal chest X-rays and electronic health records.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Explainable machine learning and online calculators to predict heart failure mortality in intensive care units.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Dexmedetomidine administration reduced mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Inflammation-Driven Prognosis in Advanced Heart Failure: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Model for One-Year Mortality.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Predicting survival time for critically ill patients with heart failure using conformalized survival analysis.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) combined with hypertension is an extremely important cause of in-hospital mortality, especially for the intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, under intense working pressure, the medical staff are easily overwhelmed by the large number of clinical signals generated in the ICU, which may lead to treatment delay, sub-optimal care, or even wrong clinical decisions. Individual risk stratification is an essential strategy for managing ICU patients with HF combined with hypertension. Artificial intelligence, especially machine learning (ML), can develop superior models to predict the prognosis of these patients. This study aimed to develop a machine learning method to predict the 28-day mortality for ICU patients with HF combined with hypertension. Methods: We enrolled all critically ill patients with HF combined with hypertension in the Medical Information Mart for IntensiveCare Database-IV (MIMIC-IV, v.1.4) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) from 2008 to 2019. Subsequently, MIMIC-IV was divided into training cohort and testing cohort in an 8:2 ratio, and eICU-CRD was designated as the external validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression with internal tenfold cross-validation was used for data dimension reduction and identifying the most valuable predictive features for 28-day mortality. Based on its accuracy and area under the curve (AUC), the best model in the validation cohort was selected. In addition, we utilized the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method to highlight the importance of model features, analyze the impact of individual features on model output, and visualize an individual's Shapley values. Results: A total of 3,458 and 6582 patients with HF combined with hypertension in MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD were included. The patients, including 1,756 males, had a median (Q1, Q3) age of 75 (65, 84) years. After selection, 22 out of a total of 58 clinical parameters were extracted to develop the machine-learning models. Among four constructed models, the Neural Networks (NN) model performed the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.764 and 0.674 in the test cohort and external validation cohort, respectively. In addition, a simplified model including seven variables was built based on NN, which also had good predictive performance (AUC: 0.741). Feature importance analysis showed that age, mechanical ventilation (MECHVENT), chloride, bun, anion gap, paraplegia, rdw (RDW), hyperlipidemia, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO Conclusion: We developed a predictive model to predict the 28-day mortality for ICU patients with HF combined with hypertension, which proved superior to the traditional logistic regression analysis. The SHAP method enables machine learning models to be more interpretable, thereby helping clinicians to better understand the reasoning behind the outcome and assess in-hospital outcomes for critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.