Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312271›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Prognostic relevance of demographic factors in cardiac magnetic resonance-proven acute myocarditis: A cohort study.

Antonio Cannata, Prashan Bhatti, Roman Roy, Mohammad Al-Agil, Allen Daniel, Emma Ferone, Antonio Jordan, Barbara Cassimon, Susie Bradwell, Abdullah Khawaja and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Post-viral myocarditis.Heart failure reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Acute and Chronic Myocarditis in Men and Women.Current heart failure reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio CannataBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Prashan BhattiKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Roman RoyBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mohammad Al-AgilKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Allen DanielKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Emma FeroneBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Antonio JordanKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Barbara CassimonKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Susie BradwellKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Abdullah KhawajaKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew SadlerKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Aamir ShamsiKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Josef HuntingtonBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander BirkinshawKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Irfan RindKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Stefania RosminiKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Susan PiperKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel SadoKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mauro GiaccaBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ajay M ShahBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Theresa McDonaghKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Paul A ScottKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel I BromageBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/CRTF/21/24175British Heart Foundation RG/19/11/34633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Acute myocarditis (AM) is a heterogeneous condition with variable estimates of survival. Contemporary criteria for the diagnosis of clinically suspected AM enable non-invasive assessment, resulting in greater sensitivity and more representative cohorts. We aimed to describe the demographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with AM diagnosed using non-invasive criteria. Methods and results: A total of 199 patients with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-confirmed AM were included. The majority ( Conclusion: AM is highly heterogeneous with an overall favourable prognosis. Three-quarters of patients with AM present with chest pain, which is associated with a benign prognosis. AM presenting with life-threatening arrhythmias is associated with a higher risk of adverse events.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)ethnicitymyocarditisoutcomespresentationsex

Identifiers

PMID36312271
PMCPMC9606774
OpenAlexW4304845644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.