ArticleProceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Flexible-Window Predictions on Electronic Health Records.
Article in Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable prediction of childhood obesity using only routinely collected EHRs may be possible.Obesity pillars · 2024Article
- An Interoperable Machine Learning Pipeline for Pediatric Obesity Risk Estimation.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024Article
- Predicting Attrition Patterns from Pediatric Weight Management Programs.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2022Article
- An Extensive Data Processing Pipeline for MIMIC-IV.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2022Article
- Few-Shot Learning with Semi-Supervised Transformers for Electronic Health Records.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various types of machine learning techniques are available for analyzing electronic health records (EHRs). For predictive tasks, most existing methods either explicitly or implicitly divide these time-series datasets into predetermined observation and prediction windows. Patients have different lengths of medical history and the desired predictions (for purposes such as diagnosis or treatment) are required at different times in the future. In this paper, we propose a method that uses a sequence-to-sequence generator model to transfer an input sequence of EHR data to a sequence of user-defined target labels, providing the end-users with "flexible" observation and prediction windows to define. We use adversarial and semi-supervised approaches in our design, where the sequence-to-sequence model acts as a generator and a discriminator distinguishes between the actual (observed) and generated labels. We evaluate our models through an extensive series of experiments using two large EHR datasets from adult and pediatric populations. In an obesity predicting case study, we show that our model can achieve superior results in flexible-window prediction tasks, after being trained once and even with large missing rates on the input EHR data. Moreover, using a number of attention analysis experiments, we show that the proposed model can effectively learn more relevant features in different prediction tasks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.