Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Sexual double standard: A gender-based prejudice referring to sexual freedom and sexual shyness.

Carmen Gómez-Berrocal, Nieves Moyano, Ana Álvarez-Muelas, Juan Carlos Sierra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Examining the Sexual Double Standards and Hypocrisy in Partner Suitability Appraisals Within a Norwegian Sample.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Substance Use and Risky Sexual Behavior Among Adolescents: A Cross-National Clustered Analysis of 35 European and North American Countries.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carmen Gómez-BerrocalMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Nieves MoyanoDepartment of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Ana Álvarez-MuelasMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Juan Carlos SierraMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sexual double standard (SDS) consists of judging men and women differently for the same sexual behavior. This study contributes to research on the factors that determine inconsistent adherence to the SDS. It uses a descriptive methodology to analyze the association between individual and contextual factors both with adherence to the SDS, and with four SDS adherence typologies (man-favorable SDS, woman-favorable SDS, egalitarian and ambivalent). A total of 1,206 heterosexual Spanish adults (603 men and 603 women) participated. The mean age in the male sample was 41.7 (

Indexed as

gender-based prejudicesexual double standardsexual freedomsexual gender normssexual shyness

Identifiers

PMID36312072
PMCPMC9599746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.