Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312068›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.

Ivan Mangiulli, Fabiana Battista, Nadja Abdel Kafi, Eline Coveliers, Theodore Carlson Webster, Antonietta Curci, Henry Otgaar

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivan MangiulliDepartment of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Fabiana BattistaFaculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, Leuven, Belgium.
Nadja Abdel KafiForensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Eline CoveliersFaculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, Leuven, Belgium.
Theodore Carlson WebsterSchool of Applied Sciences, Psychology, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Antonietta CurciDepartment of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Henry OtgaarFaculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People are often exposed to fake news. Such an exposure to misleading information might lead to false memory creation. We examined whether people can form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news. Furthermore, we investigated which individual factors might predict false memory formation for fake news. In two experiments, we provided participants with two pieces of COVID-19-related fake news along with a non-probative photograph. In Experiment 1, 41% (

Indexed as

conspiratorial contentCOVID-19fake newsfalse memoriesindividual differences

Identifiers

PMID36312068
PMCPMC9608342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.