ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Clinical implementation of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology with development of a novel workflow-efficient picture archiving and communication system-based automated brain tumor segmentation and radiomic feature extraction.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence algorithms for differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression in high-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Volumetric and 2D Measurements and Longitudinal Trajectories in the Response Assessment ofAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Trial
- Matched MRI, Segmentations, and Histopathologic Images of Brain Metastases from Primary Lung Cancer.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Image-Based Search in Radiology: Identification of Brain Tumor Subtypes within Databases Using MRI-Based Radiomic Features.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of deep learning and radiomic signatures for overall survival prediction in recurrent high-grade glioma treated with immunotherapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- FLAIR-based radiomics signature from brain-tumor interface for early prediction of response to EGFR-TKI therapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Diffusion MRI is superior to quantitative T2-FLAIR mismatch in predicting molecular subtypes of human non-enhancing gliomas.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Towards consistency in pediatric brain tumor measurements: Challenges, solutions, and the role of artificial intelligence-based segmentation.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Deep Learning for MRI Segmentation and Molecular Subtyping in Glioblastoma: Critical Aspects from an Emerging Field.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Young Professionals in Neuroradiology: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- A large open access dataset of brain metastasis 3D segmentations on MRI with clinical and imaging information.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Introduction to the Special Issue on "Role of Novel Imaging Technique in Brain Tumors".Cancers · 2024Article
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning: a two-center study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Application of novel PACS-based informatics platform to identify imaging based predictors of CDKN2A allelic status in glioblastomas.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A multi-institutional pediatric dataset of clinical radiology MRIs by the Children's Brain Tumor Network.ArXiv · 2023Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumor Imaging: A Step toward Personalized Medicine.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning: A two-center study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Evolution and implementation of radiographic response criteria in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
- Tumor volume features predict survival outcomes for patients diagnosed with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Personalized interpretation of medical images is critical for optimum patient care, but current tools available to physicians to perform quantitative analysis of patient's medical images in real time are significantly limited. In this work, we describe a novel platform within PACS for volumetric analysis of images and thus development of large expert annotated datasets in parallel with radiologist performing the reading that are critically needed for development of clinically meaningful AI algorithms. Specifically, we implemented a deep learning-based algorithm for automated brain tumor segmentation and radiomics extraction, and embedded it into PACS to accelerate a supervised, end-to- end workflow for image annotation and radiomic feature extraction. Materials and methods: An algorithm was trained to segment whole primary brain tumors on FLAIR images from multi-institutional glioma BraTS 2021 dataset. Algorithm was validated using internal dataset from Yale New Haven Health (YHHH) and compared (by Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]) to radiologist manual segmentation. A UNETR deep-learning was embedded into Visage 7 (Visage Imaging, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) diagnostic workstation. The automatically segmented brain tumor was pliable for manual modification. PyRadiomics (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) was natively embedded into Visage 7 for feature extraction from the brain tumor segmentations. Results: UNETR brain tumor segmentation took on average 4 s and the median DSC was 86%, which is similar to published literature but lower than the RSNA ASNR MICCAI BRATS challenge 2021. Finally, extraction of 106 radiomic features within PACS took on average 5.8 ± 0.01 s. The extracted radiomic features did not vary over time of extraction or whether they were extracted within PACS or outside of PACS. The ability to perform segmentation and feature extraction before radiologist opens the study was made available in the workflow. Opening the study in PACS, allows the radiologists to verify the segmentation and thus annotate the study. Conclusion: Integration of image processing algorithms for tumor auto-segmentation and feature extraction into PACS allows curation of large datasets of annotated medical images and can accelerate translation of research into development of personalized medicine applications in the clinic. The ability to use familiar clinical tools to revise the AI segmentations and natively embedding the segmentation and radiomic feature extraction tools on the diagnostic workstation accelerates the process to generate ground-truth data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.