Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Interpretive JIVE: Connections with CCA and an application to brain connectivity.

Raphiel J Murden, Zhengwu Zhang, Ying Guo, Benjamin B Risk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probabilistic Joint and Individual Variation Explained (ProJIVE) for Data Integration.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raphiel J MurdenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Zhengwu ZhangDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Ying GuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Benjamin B RiskDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Statistical approaches to improving functional connectivity estimates with an application to autismR01MH129855 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Benjamin Brewster Risk · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Advancing methods for structural connectome acquisition and estimation in older adultsR21AG066970 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HEFFNER, KATHI L, LIN, FENG VANKEE · 2020 to 2020
$438k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG066970NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint and Individual Variation Explained (JIVE) is a model that decomposes multiple datasets obtained on the same subjects into shared structure, structure unique to each dataset, and noise. JIVE is an important tool for multimodal data integration in neuroimaging. The two most common algorithms are R.JIVE, an iterative approach, and AJIVE, which uses principal angle analysis. The joint structure in JIVE is defined by shared subspaces, but interpreting these subspaces can be challenging. In this paper, we reinterpret AJIVE as a canonical correlation analysis of principal component scores. This reformulation, which we call CJIVE, (1) provides an intuitive view of AJIVE; (2) uses a permutation test for the number of joint components; (3) can be used to predict subject scores for out-of-sample observations; and (4) is computationally fast. We conduct simulation studies that show CJIVE and AJIVE are accurate when the total signal ranks are correctly specified but, generally inaccurate when the total ranks are too large. CJIVE and AJIVE can still extract joint signal even when the joint signal variance is relatively small. JIVE methods are applied to integrate functional connectivity (resting-state fMRI) and structural connectivity (diffusion MRI) from the Human Connectome Project. Surprisingly, the edges with largest loadings in the joint component in functional connectivity do not coincide with the same edges in the structural connectivity, indicating more complex patterns than assumed in spatial priors. Using these loadings, we accurately predict joint subject scores in new participants. We also find joint scores are associated with fluid intelligence, highlighting the potential for JIVE to reveal important shared structure.

Indexed as

canonical correlation analysisdata integrationfunctional connectivityHuman Connectome Projectjoint and individual variance explainedprincipal component analysisstructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID36312020
PMCPMC9614436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.