ArticleKorean journal of women health nursing2021
[Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity].
Article in Korean journal of women health nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale-16™ in Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses].Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2024Article
- Development and Psychometric Properties of the Health Belief Model Scale for Premature Birth Prevention (HBM-PBP) for Women of Childbearing Age.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in North Korean Defectors: A Scoping Review.Psychiatry investigation · 2023Article
- The Korean Version of Pandemic Stress Questionnaire: Validation in Korean Population.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Article
- [The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Readiness for Practice Survey for Nursing Students].Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2022Article
- Year in review and appreciation for 2021 reviewers.Korean journal of women health nursing · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.