Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36311822›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Physician Perspectives on Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology.

Sean Maroongroge, Brian De, Kristina D Woodhouse, Roland L Bassett, Percy Lee, Elizabeth S Bloom, Grace L Smith, Steven J Frank, Jing Li, George Perkins and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sean MaroongrogeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Brian DeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kristina D WoodhouseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Roland L BassettDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Percy LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth S BloomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Grace L SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Steven J FrankDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
George PerkinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Prajnan DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Albert C KoongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Benjamin D SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Chenyang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Telemedicine enthusiasm and uptake in radiation oncology rapidly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unclear if and how telemedicine should be used after the COVID-19 public health emergency ends is unclear. Herein, we report on our institution's provider experience after the mature adoption of telemedicine. Methods and Materials: We distributed a survey to all radiation oncology attending physicians at our institution in October 2021 to assess satisfaction, facilitators, and barriers to telemedicine implementation. We performed quantitative and qualitative analyses to characterize satisfaction and identify influencing factors whether telemedicine is employed. We calculated the average proportion of visits that providers expected to be appropriately performed with telemedicine for each disease site and visit type. Results: A total of 60 of the 82 eligible radiation oncologists (73%) responded to the survey, of whom 78% were satisfied with telemedicine in the radiation oncology department and 83% wished to continue offering video visits after the COVID-19 public health emergency ends. Common patient factors influencing whether physicians offer telemedicine include the patient's travel burden, patient preferences, and whether a physical examination is required. Approximately 20% of new consultations and 50% of weekly management visits were estimated to be appropriate for telemedicine. The central nervous system/pediatrics and thoracic faculty considered telemedicine appropriate for the greatest proportion of new consultations, and 93% of respondents felt comfortable determining whether telemedicine was appropriate. Conclusions: Surveyed radiation oncologists were satisfied with telemedicine in their practice, and wished to continue offering video visits in the future. Our data suggest that payers should continue to support this patient-centered technology.

Identifiers

PMID36311822
PMCPMC9598490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.