Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36311550›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2022

Developing and testing a prediction model for periodontal disease using machine learning and big electronic dental record data.

Jay S Patel, Chang Su, Marisol Tellez, Jasim M Albandar, Rishi Rao, Vishnu Iyer, Evan Shi, Huanmei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jay S PatelHealth Informatics, Department of Health Services Administrations and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Chang SuHealth Informatics, Department of Health Services Administrations and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Marisol TellezDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jasim M AlbandarDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.
Rishi RaoHealth Informatics, Department of Health Services Administrations and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Vishnu IyerHealth Informatics, Department of Health Services Administrations and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Evan ShiHealth Informatics, Department of Health Services Administrations and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Huanmei WuHealth Informatics, Department of Health Services Administrations and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in periodontal disease (PD) research and periodontal treatments, 42% of the US population suffer from periodontitis. PD can be prevented if high-risk patients are identified early to provide preventive care. Prediction models can help assess risk for PD before initiation and progression; nevertheless, utilization of existing PD prediction models is seldom because of their suboptimal performance. This study aims to develop and test the PD prediction model using machine learning (ML) and electronic dental record (EDR) data that could provide large sample sizes and up-to-date information. A cohort of 27,138 dental patients and grouped PD diagnoses into: healthy control, mild PD, and severe PD was generated. The ML model (XGBoost) was trained (80% training data) and tested (20% testing data) with a total of 74 features extracted from the EDR. We used a five-fold cross-validation strategy to identify the optimal hyperparameters of the model for this one-

Indexed as

dental informaticselectronic dental recordelectronic health recordmachine learningperiodontal diseaseprediction modelsocial determinants of healthXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID36311550
PMCPMC9608121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.