ReviewEmergency medicine international2022
A Narrative Review of Different Hemostatic Materials in Emergency Treatment of Trauma.
Review in Emergency medicine international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of AriClot™ hemostatic powder versus standard pressure dressing for bleeding control in civilian penetrating trauma: A randomized controlled trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety evaluation of a novel hemostatic gelatin matrix for intraoperative hemostasis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Flexible Catechol-Conjugated Chitosan/Gelatin Bilayer Patches for Topical Hemostasis in Laparoscopic Surgery.ACS omega · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of SURGICEL®: Efficacy, Applications, and Radiological Insights in Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Injectable hemostatic foam hydrogel for traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Morphology Effect of Puffball Spores on Hemostasis: A Promising Solution for Hemostatic Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Applications of Hydrogels in Emergency Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative analyses of the hemostatic efficacy and surgical device performance of powdered oxidized regenerated cellulose and starch-based powder formulations.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Absorbable Haemostatic Artefacts as a Diagnostic Challenge in Postoperative Follow-Up After Oncological Resection in Head and Neck Tumours: Systematic Review of Current Literature and Two Case Reports.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Polydopamine-Coated Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofiber Membrane Loaded with Thrombin for Wound Hemostasis.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemostatic materials are very important for the treatment of a large number of bleeding trauma patients in battlefield and disaster environments. Different types of hemostatic materials need to be used for emergency hemostasis according to different injury parts and severity. At present, the first-aid hemostatic materials have been well applied to the bleeding of body surface wounds, limbs, and junctions, but there are still no ideal hemostatic materials in the early treatment of first aid for the deep and incompressible bleeding of thoracoabdominal cavity and visceral organs. This paper reviews the classification and mechanism of hemostatic materials, as well as the application and research progress in trauma emergency, so as to provide reference for the application of hemostatic materials in early first-aid emergency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.