Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36311410›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

An innovative approach to using an intensive field course to build scientific and professional skills.

Adrienne B Nicotra, Sonya R Geange, Nur H A Bahar, Hannah Carle, Alexandra Catling, Andres Garcia, Rosalie J Harris, Megan L Head, Marvin Jin, Michael R Whitehead and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adrienne B NicotraResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-369X
Sonya R GeangeResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-7234
Nur H A BaharResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-1803
Hannah CarleResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-6081
Alexandra CatlingSchool of Biological Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7537-183X
Andres GarciaResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-6511
Rosalie J HarrisResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-5996
Megan L HeadResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-7661
Marvin JinResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0839-0758
Michael R WhiteheadSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-5746
Hannah ZurcherResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-5660
Elizabeth A BeckmannResearch School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5074-4070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on the design and evaluation of Field Studies in Functional Ecology (FSFE), a two-week intensive residential field course that enables students to master core content in functional ecology alongside skills that facilitate their transition from "student" to "scientist." We provide an overview of the course structure, showing how the constituent elements have been designed and refined over successive iterations of the course. We detail how FSFE students: (1) Work closely with discipline specialists to develop a small group project that tests an hypothesis to answer a genuine scientific question in the field; (2) Learn critical skills of data management and communication; and (3) Analyze, interpret, and present their results in the format of a scientific symposium. This process is repeated in an iterative "cognitive apprenticeship" model, supported by a series of workshops that name and explicitly instruct the students in "hard" and "soft" skills (e.g., statistics and teamwork, respectively) critically relevant for research and other careers. FSFE students develop a coherent and nuanced understanding of how to approach and execute ecological studies. The sophisticated knowledge and ecological research skills that they develop during the course is demonstrated through high-quality presentations and peer-reviewed publications in an open-access, student-led journal. We outline our course structure and evaluate its efficacy to show how this novel combination of field course elements allows students to gain maximum value from their educational journey, and to develop cognitive, affective, and reflective tools to help apply their skills as scientists.

Indexed as

cognitive apprenticeshipfield coursefieldworkfunctional ecologyresearcher identityuniversity teaching

Identifiers

PMID36311410
PMCPMC9596330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.