Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36311235›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Multi-atlas segmentation and quantification of muscle, bone and subcutaneous adipose tissue in the lower leg using peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Sokratis Makrogiannis, Azubuike Okorie, Angelo Di Iorio, Stefania Bandinelli, Luigi Ferrucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anomaly detection in medical via multimodal foundation models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhanced muscle and fat segmentation for CT-based body composition analysis: a comparative study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sokratis MakrogiannisMath Imaging and Visual Computing Lab, Division of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delaware State University, Dover, DE, United States.
Azubuike OkorieMath Imaging and Visual Computing Lab, Division of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delaware State University, Dover, DE, United States.
Angelo Di IorioAntalgic Mini-invasive and Rehab-Outpatients Unit, Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University "G.d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Stefania BandinelliGeriatric Unit, Local Health Unit Tuscany Centre, Florence, Italy.
Luigi FerrucciNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Gregory E Hicks · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
Research Capacity CoreU54MD015959 · NIMHD · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Sangeeta Gupta, MELISSA A HARRINGTON · 2022 to 2026
$22.6M
QUANTITATIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR STUDIES OF AGING PHENOTYPES AND AGE-RELATED DISEASESSC3GM113754 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAKROGIANNIS, SOKRATIS · 2015 to 2024
$686k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM113754NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD015959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reproducible tissue identification is essential for understanding structural and functional changes that may occur naturally with aging, or because of a chronic disease, or in response to intervention therapies. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is regularly employed for body composition studies, especially for the structural and material properties of the bone. Furthermore, pQCT acquisition requires low radiation dose and the scanner is compact and portable. However, pQCT scans have limited spatial resolution and moderate SNR. pQCT image quality is frequently degraded by involuntary subject movement during image acquisition. These limitations may often compromise the accuracy of tissue quantification, and emphasize the need for automated and robust quantification methods. We propose a tissue identification and quantification methodology that addresses image quality limitations and artifacts, with increased interest in subject movement. We introduce a multi-atlas image segmentation (MAIS) framework for semantic segmentation of hard and soft tissues in pQCT scans at multiple levels of the lower leg. We describe the stages of statistical atlas generation, deformable registration and multi-tissue classifier fusion. We evaluated the performance of our methodology using multiple deformable registration approaches against reference tissue masks. We also evaluated the performance of conventional model-based segmentation against the same reference data to facilitate comparisons. We studied the effect of subject movement on tissue segmentation quality. We also applied the top performing method to a larger out-of-sample dataset and report the quantification results. The results show that multi-atlas image segmentation with diffeomorphic deformation and probabilistic label fusion produces very good quality over all tissues, even for scans with significant quality degradation. The application of our technique to the larger dataset reveals trends of age-related body composition changes that are consistent with the literature. Because of its robustness to subject motion artifacts, our MAIS methodology enables analysis of larger number of scans than conventional state-of-the-art methods. Automated analysis of both soft and hard tissues in pQCT is another contribution of this work.

Indexed as

clinical applicationmulti-atlas techniquespQCTsubject movementtissue quantificationtissue segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36311235
PMCPMC9614313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.