ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2022
Quantifying CrossFit
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute effect of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement on pacing and kinetic expression during shorter and longer bouts of high intensity functional training.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Trial
- Metabolic and perceived effort responses following acute multi-ingredient pre-workout supplementation prior to high-intensity functional training workouts.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Workout Duration Alters the Importance of Predictive Traits on High-Intensity Functional Training Workout Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Acute neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of varying relative loads in cross-training modalities.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Digital fist bumps: searching for datafication and digitalisation in everyday CrossFit coaching practice.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Muscular performance analysis in "cross" modalities: comparison between "AMRAP," "EMOM" and "RFT" configurations.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Six weeks of polarized functional interval training with large training load reductions does not affect performance gains compared to traditional workouts.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Pacing Strategies Differ by Sex and Rank in 2020 CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk Factors for Injury in CrossFitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Normative Scores for CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The design of high-intensity functional training (HIFT; e. g., CrossFit
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.