Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36311042›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2022

Variability in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparations Used in Regenerative Medicine: A Comparative Analysis.

Raghvendra Vikram Tey, Pallavi Haldankar, Vivek R Joshi, Rishi Raj, Ravindra Maradi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bone Growth Stimulators to Enhance Spinal Fusion Outcomes.Spine surgery and related research · 2026
    Review
  9. Recombinant Human Amelogenin Protein Enhances Healing of Osteochondral Injury in a Goat Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raghvendra Vikram TeyDepartment of Pathophysiology & Clinical Medicine, Western Atlantic University School of Medicine, Freeport, Grand Bahamas, Bahamas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-9094
Pallavi HaldankarDepartment of Pathophysiology & Clinical Medicine, Western Atlantic University School of Medicine, Freeport, Grand Bahamas, Bahamas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-296X
Vivek R JoshiDepartment of Biochemistry, Department of Interprofessional Chronic Care, Drexel University College of Medicine, Wyomissing, Reading, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-9502
Rishi RajDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pikeville Medical Center, Pikeville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-3246
Ravindra MaradiDepartment of Biochemistry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4289-3199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and its derivatives are used in several aesthetic, dental, and musculoskeletal procedures. Their efficacy is primarily due to the release of various growth factors (GF), interleukins, cytokines, and white blood cells. However, the PRP preparation methods are highly variable, and studies lack consistency in reporting complete procedures to prepare PRP and characterize PRP and its derivatives. Also, all the tissue-specific (in vivo and in vitro) interactions and functional properties of the various derivatives/factors of the PRP have not been taken into consideration by any study so far. This creates a potential space for further standardization of the PRP preparation methods and customization of PRP/PRP derivatives targeted at tissue-specific/pathology specific requirements that would enable efficacious and widely acceptable usage of PRP as main therapy, rather than being used as adjuvant therapy. The main objective of our study was to investigate the variability in PRP preparation methods and to analyze their efficacy and reliability. Method: This study considered articles published in the last 5 years, highlighting the variability in their PRP preparation methods and characterization of PRP. Following the PRISMA protocol, we selected 13 articles for the study. The selected articles were assessed using NHLBI quality assessment tool. Results: We noted differences in (1) approaches to producing PRP, (2) extent of characterization of PRP, (3) small scale and large-scale preparation methods, (4) in vitro and in vivo studies. Conclusion: We identified two studies describing the procedures which are simple, reproducible, economical, provide a good yield of platelets, and therefore can be considered methods for further tissue-specific and pathology-specific standardizations of PRP and its derivatives. We recommend further randomized studies to understand the full therapeutic potential of the constituents of PRP and its derivatives.

Identifiers

PMID36311042
PMCPMC9613381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.