Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310899›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2022

Developing a dashboard for program evaluation in competency-based training programs: a design-based research project.

Yusuf Yilmaz, Robert Carey, Teresa M Chan, Venkat Bandi, Shisong Wang, Robert A Woods, Debajyoti Mondal, Brent Thoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Expanding the Study of Bias in Medical Education Assessment.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023
    Article
  10. The Ladder of Inference re-visited: "Don't jump to confusions!"Canadian medical education journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yusuf YilmazContinuing Professional Development Office, and McMaster program for Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT), McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Robert CareyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Teresa M ChanContinuing Professional Development Office, and McMaster program for Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT), McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Venkat BandiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Shisong WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Robert A WoodsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Debajyoti MondalDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brent ThomaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Canadian specialist residency training programs are implementing a form of competency-based medical education (CBME) that requires the assessment of entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Dashboards could be used to track the completion of EPAs to support program evaluation. Methods: Using a design-based research process, we identified program evaluation needs related to CBME assessments and designed a dashboard containing elements (data, analytics, and visualizations) meeting these needs. We interviewed leaders from the emergency medicine program and postgraduate medical education office at the University of Saskatchewan. Two investigators thematically analyzed interview transcripts to identify program evaluation needs that were audited by two additional investigators. Identified needs were described using quotes, analytics, and visualizations. Results: Between July 1, 2019 and April 6, 2021 we conducted 17 interviews with six participants (two program leaders and four institutional leaders). Four needs emerged as themes: tracking changes in overall assessment metrics, comparing metrics to the assessment plan, evaluating rotation performance, and engagement with the assessment metrics. We addressed these needs by presenting analytics and visualizations within a dashboard. Conclusions: We identified program evaluation needs related to EPA assessments and designed dashboard elements to meet them. This work will inform the development of other CBME assessment dashboards designed to support program evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID36310899
PMCPMC9588183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.