Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310796›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2022

Evaluating the incidence of bacteriuria in female patients before and after implementation of external urinary collection devices.

Mandee M Noval, Surbhi Leekha, Michael Armahizer, Abigale Celotto, Meghna Bhatt, Hyunuk Seung, Kimberly Claeys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mandee M NovalDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Surbhi LeekhaDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael ArmahizerDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abigale CelottoDepartment of Nursing, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Meghna BhattDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hyunuk SeungDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kimberly ClaeysDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-604X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External urinary collection devices (ECDs) are increasingly used in female patients, however, their impact on bacteriuria and antimicrobial use is unclear. Comparing the periods before and after the implementation of an ECD use policy, we found an overall decrease in bacteriuria but no significant decrease in trend of monthly rates. Antimicrobial use for genitourinary indications did not change.

Identifiers

PMID36310796
PMCPMC9614887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.