ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022
Early preclinical experience of a mixed reality ultrasound system with active GUIDance for NEedle-based interventions: The GUIDE study.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-Based Medical Navigation Systems for Cardiac Interventions: Recent Technological Advances.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Comparison of the ArtekMed mixed reality teleconsultation system with a standard video call system in critical care: user acceptance and feasibility analysis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Application of Mixed/Augmented Reality in Interventional Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Virtual and augmented reality in intensive care medicine: a systematic review.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Use of ultrasound (US) to facilitate vascular access has increased compared to landmark-based procedures despite ergonomic challenges and need for extrapolation of 2-dimensional images to understand needle position. The MantUS™ system (Sentiar, Inc.,) uses a mixed reality (MxR) interface to display US images and integrate real-time needle tracking. Objective: The purpose of this prospective preclinical study was to evaluate the feasibility and usability of MantUS in a simulated environment. Methods: Participants were recruited from pediatric cardiology and critical care. Access was obtained in 2 vascular access training models: a femoral access model and a head and neck model for a total of 4 vascular access sites under 2 conditions-conventional US and MantUS. Participants were randomized for order of completion. Videos were obtained, and quality of access including time required, repositions, number of attempts, and angle of approach were quantified. Results: Use of MantUS resulted in an overall reduction in number of needle repositions ( Conclusion: Use of MantUS improved vascular access among all comers, including the quality of access. This improvement was even more notable in the vascular variant (RFV). MantUS readily benefited users by providing improved spatial understanding. Further development of MantUS will focus on improving user interface and experience, with larger clinical usage and in-human studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.