Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310609›Full record

ArticleDesign for health (Abingdon, England)2022

Co-designing for behaviour change: The development of a theory-informed oral-care intervention for stroke survivors.

Matthew Lievesley, Rachael Powell, Daniel Carey, Sharon Hulme, Lucy O'Malley, Wendy Westoby, Jess Zadik, Audrey Bowen, Paul Brocklehurst, Craig J Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Design for health (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew LievesleySchool of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-6418
Rachael PowellDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-8873
Daniel CareySchool of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-0038
Sharon HulmeDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-1653
Lucy O'MalleyDivision of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-3814
Wendy WestobyStroke Survivor and Public Contributor in the research team, Leigh, UK.
Jess ZadikSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-7646
Audrey BowenGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance & University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-1215
Paul BrocklehurstNWORTH Clinical Trials Unit, University of Bangor, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-9030
Craig J SmithManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-9919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses how research to understand the oral care needs and experiences of stroke survivors was translated into a prototypical intervention. It addresses the challenge of how to develop service improvements in healthcare settings that are both person-centred, through the use of co-design, and also based on theory and evidence. A sequence of co-design workshops with stroke survivors, family carers, and with health and social care professionals, ran in parallel with an analysis of behavioural factors. This determined key actions which could improve mouthcare for this community and identified opportunities to integrate recognized behaviour-change techniques into the intervention. In this way, behaviour change theory, evidence from qualitative research, and experience-based co-design were effectively combined. The intervention proposed is predominantly a patient-facing resource, intended to support stroke survivors and their carers with mouth care, as they transition from hospital care to living at home. This addresses a gap in existing provision, as other published oral-care protocols for stroke are clinician-facing and concerned primarily with acute care (in the first days after a stroke). Although it draws on the experiences of a single design project, this study articulates a 'working relationship' between design practice methods and the application of behaviour change theory.

Indexed as

behaviour changeCo-designEBCDoral-careperson-centred carestroke care

Identifiers

PMID36310609
PMCPMC9612934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.