Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310538›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2023

Neurofilament light chain in drug development for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a critical appraisal.

Michael Benatar, Joanne Wuu, Martin R Turner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Longitudinal CSF and Serum Biomarker Dynamics in Tofersen-TreatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael BenatarDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0094-5429
Joanne WuuDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Martin R TurnerNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0267-3180
University of Miami · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Uncovering new genes and disease modifiers for ALS and related disordersU54NS092091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Michael Benatar · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
Pre-Symptomatic Familial ALS (Pre-fALS) Study: From Prodrome and Biomarkers to ALS/FTD PreventionRF1NS105479 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BENATAR, MICHAEL, WUU, JOANNE · 2025 to 2025
$11.3M
Multi-Center ALS Biomarker Validation Study (CReATe Biomarkers)U01NS107027 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BENATAR, MICHAEL, MALASPINA, ANDREA · 2018 to 2023
$3.5M
Pre-Symptomatic Familial ALS (Pre-fALS) Study - Prelude to a Treatment Trial; Administrative SupplementR01NS105479 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BENATAR, MICHAEL, WUU, JOANNE · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Motor Neurone Disease Association TURNER/OCT18/989-797NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105479NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS105479NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS107027NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS092091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) biomarkers has grown exponentially over the course of the last 25 years, with great hope that they might serve as tools to facilitate the development of meaningful therapies for this otherwise inexorably progressive and invariably fatal disease. Effective use of biomarkers, however, requires an understanding of what it means for them to be 'fit-for-purpose' as well as an appreciation of the nuances of the clinical context(s) in which they will be applied. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) has emerged as a leading candidate with enormous potential to aid ALS therapy development; it is, however, also profoundly misunderstood. Within the conceptual framework of the BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource, developed by the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration in the USA, we consider the evidence supporting the use of NfL for a variety of purposes in different clinical contexts. We conclude that: (i) it may serve as a susceptibility/risk biomarker in populations at elevated risk for ALS; (ii) it has value as a prognostic biomarker when measured early in the course of established disease, empowering stratification or dynamic randomization to amplify the signal-to-noise ratio of promising therapeutics; and (iii) there is sufficient evidence to support the use of a reduction in NfL in response to an experimental therapeutic as a pharmacodynamic biomarker that may aid in phase 2 trial go/no-go decisions. Moreover, the basis for expecting that a reduction in NfL is a reasonably likely surrogate end-point (i.e. reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit-which may be more than simply survival) is nuanced, and depends on when in the course of disease the experimental therapeutic is administered.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBiomarkersDrug DevelopmentHumansIntermediate FilamentsNeurofilament ProteinsBiomarkersNeurofilament Proteinsbiomarkerneurofilamentsurrogatetherapy development

Identifiers

PMID36310538
PMCPMC10316774
OpenAlexW4307778135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.