Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310403›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Segmentation by test-time optimization for CBCT-based adaptive radiation therapy.

Xiao Liang, Jaehee Chun, Howard Morgan, Ti Bai, Dan Nguyen, Justin Park, Steve Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao LiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Jaehee ChunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Howard MorganMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Ti BaiMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Dan NguyenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Justin ParkMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Steve JiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Funding

Human-like automated radiotherapy treatment planning via imitation learningR01CA254377 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN, JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Artificial Intelligence-Based Quality Assurance for Online Adaptive RadiotherapyR01CA258987 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Steve Bin Jiang, Dan Nguyen · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
Intelligent treatment planning for cancer radiotherapyR01CA237269 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN, JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237269NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254377NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258987Varian Medical Systems Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOnline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) requires accurate and efficient auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) in mostly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, which often have severe artifacts and lack soft-tissue contrast, making direct segmentation very challenging. Propagating expert-drawn contours from the pretreatment planning CT through traditional or deep learning (DL)-based deformable image registration (DIR) can achieve improved results in many situations. Typical DL-based DIR models are population based, that is, trained with a dataset for a population of patients, and so they may be affected by the generalizability problem.

methodsIn this paper, we propose a method called test-time optimization (TTO) to refine a pretrained DL-based DIR population model, first for each individual test patient, and then progressively for each fraction of online ART treatment. Our proposed method is less susceptible to the generalizability problem and thus can improve overall performance of different DL-based DIR models by improving model accuracy, especially for outliers. Our experiments used data from 239 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to test the proposed method. First, we trained a population model with 200 patients and then applied TTO to the remaining 39 test patients by refining the trained population model to obtain 39 individualized models. We compared each of the individualized models with the population model in terms of segmentation accuracy.

resultsThe average improvement of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) of segmentation can be up to 0.04 (5%) and 0.98 mm (25%), respectively, with the individualized models compared to the population model over 17 selected OARs and a target of 39 patients. Although the average improvement may seem mild, we found that the improvement for outlier patients with structures of large anatomical changes is significant. The number of patients with at least 0.05 DSC improvement or 2 mm HD95 improvement by TTO averaged over the 17 selected structures for the state-of-the-art architecture VoxelMorph is 10 out of 39 test patients. By deriving the individualized model using TTO from the pretrained population model, TTO models can be ready in about 1 min. We also generated the adapted fractional models for each of the 39 test patients by progressively refining the individualized models using TTO to CBCT images acquired at later fractions of online ART treatment. When adapting the individualized model to a later fraction of the same patient, the model can be ready in less than a minute with slightly improved accuracy.

conclusionsThe proposed TTO method is well suited for online ART and can boost segmentation accuracy for DL-based DIR models, especially for outlier patients where the pretrained models fail.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCBCTdeep learningdeformable image registrationsegmentationtest-time optimization

Identifiers

PMID36310403
PMCPMC10121749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.