Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310234›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

The extent to which soil hydraulics can explain ecohydrological separation.

Catherine E Finkenbiner, Stephen P Good, J Renée Brooks, Scott T Allen, Salini Sasidharan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine E FinkenbinerDepartment of Biological & Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-7787
Stephen P GoodDepartment of Biological & Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Stephen.good@oregonstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4363-1577
J Renée BrooksPacific Ecological Systems Division, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Scott T AllenDepartment of Natural Resources & Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.
Salini SasidharanDepartment of Biological & Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Oregon State University · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field measurements of hydrologic tracers indicate varying magnitudes of geochemical separation between subsurface pore waters. The potential for conventional soil physics alone to explain isotopic differences between preferential flow and tightly-bound water remains unclear. Here, we explore physical drivers of isotopic separations using 650 different model configurations of soil, climate, and mobile/immobile soil-water domain characteristics, without confounding fractionation or plant uptake effects. We find simulations with coarser soils and less precipitation led to reduced separation between pore spaces and drainage. Amplified separations are found with larger immobile domains and, to a lesser extent, higher mobile-immobile transfer rates. Nonetheless, isotopic separations remained small (<4‰ for δ

Indexed as

SoilWater MovementsHydrologyPlantsWaterSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID36310234
PMCPMC9618555
OpenAlexW4307952482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.