Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36310233›Full record

ReviewNPJ vaccines2022

Toxoplasmosis vaccines: what we have and where to go?

Yizhuo Zhang, Dan Li, Shaohong Lu, Bin Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Live-attenuatedVirulence · 2026
    Article
  2. HarnessingAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. A Live Attenuated AP2X-1-DeficientAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. ROP64-DeficientMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advances and Translational Challenges inVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. ATG5 Plays a Role inTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lymphotoxin beta receptorInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yizhuo ZhangInstitute of Parasitic Diseases, School of Basic Medicine and Forensics, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4502-8969
Dan LiInstitute of Parasitic Diseases, School of Basic Medicine and Forensics, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-4639
Shaohong LuInstitute of Parasitic Diseases, School of Basic Medicine and Forensics, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China. llsshh2003@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-7154
Bin ZhengInstitute of Parasitic Diseases, School of Basic Medicine and Forensics, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China. bin_zheng@foxmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3898-2946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent major advances in developing effective vaccines against toxoplasmosis, finding new protective vaccination strategies remains a challenging and elusive goal as it is critical to prevent the disease. Over the past few years, various experimental approaches have shown that developing an effective vaccine against T. gondii is achievable. However, more remains unknown due to its complicated life cycle, difficulties in clinical translation, and lack of a standardized platform. This minireview summarizes the recent advances in the development of T. gondii vaccines and the main obstacles to developing a safe, effective and durable T. gondii vaccine. The successes and failures in developing and testing vaccine candidates for the T. gondii vaccine are also discussed, which may facilitate the future development of T. gondii vaccines.

Identifiers

PMID36310233
PMCPMC9618413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.