Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309974›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2022

Factors associated with unmet need for support to maintain independence in later life: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.

Gemma Frances Spiers, Tafadzwa Patience Kunonga, Daniel Stow, Alex Hall, Andrew Kingston, Oleta Williams, Fiona Beyer, Peter Bower, Dawn Craig, Chris Todd and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gemma Frances SpiersPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-4529
Tafadzwa Patience KunongaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6193-1365
Daniel StowPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alex HallFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew KingstonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4211-7007
Oleta WilliamsPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Fiona BeyerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Peter BowerFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Dawn CraigPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Chris ToddFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Barbara HanrattyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PR-PRU-1217-21502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundpopulations are considered to have an 'unmet need' when they could benefit from, but do not get, the necessary support. Policy efforts to achieve equitable access to long-term care require an understanding of patterns of unmet need. A systematic review was conducted to identify factors associated with unmet need for support to maintain independence in later life.

methodsseven bibliographic databases and four non-bibliographic evidence sources were searched. Quantitative observational studies and qualitative systematic reviews were included if they reported factors associated with unmet need for support to maintain independence in populations aged 50+, in high-income countries. No limits to publication date were imposed. Studies were quality assessed and a narrative synthesis used, supported by forest plots to visualise data.

findingsforty-three quantitative studies and 10 qualitative systematic reviews were included. Evidence across multiple studies suggests that being male, younger age, living alone, having lower levels of income, poor self-rated health, more functional limitations and greater severity of depression were linked to unmet need. Other factors that were reported in single studies were also identified. In the qualitative reviews, care eligibility criteria, the quality, adequacy and absence of care, and cultural and language barriers were implicated in unmet need.

conclusionsthis review identifies which groups of older people may be most at risk of not accessing the support they need to maintain independence. Ongoing monitoring of unmet need is critical to support policy efforts to achieve equal ageing and equitable access to care.

Indexed as

AgingHealth Services AccessibilityAgedFemaleHumansMaleFactorsolder peoplereviewsupportunmet

Identifiers

PMID36309974
PMCPMC9618284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.