Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309878›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023

Trends in brand and generic drug utilization for dermatology providers from 2013-2019.

Rishabh S Mazmudar, Raghav Tripathi, Jeremy S Bordeaux, Jeffrey F Scott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rishabh S MazmudarMetroHealth System/Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2500 Metrohealth Dr, Cleveland, OH, 44109, U.S.A.. rsm100@case.edu.
Raghav TripathiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A.
Jeremy S BordeauxDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
Jeffrey F ScottJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription drug costs have risen considerably in the United States and are projected to reach $560 billion by 2028.

objectiveTo evaluate brand and generic drug utilization and cost proportions within Medicare Part D.

methodsPrescription data for dermatology providers were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2013-2019 Medicare Part D Prescribers by Provider datasets. Percentage of brand vs. generic drug claims and costs and cumulative annual growth rates (CAGRs) were calculated. For the most recent year of data (2019), we conducted additional sub-analyses for calculated percentages by prescriber variables.

resultsThe proportion of brand drug claims increased from 7.4% (in 2013) to 10.5% (2019) with a CAGR of 8.66%. In comparison, generic drug claims increased at a lower rate (CAGR 4.47%). The percentage of brand drug costs increased from 27.5% (in 2013) to 75.1% (2019). LIMITATIONS: Inability to assess and generalize data for prescription patterns under non-Medicare plans.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates a disproportionate rise in dermatologic brand drug claims and a substantial increase in costs associated with brand drugs. Brand-name drugs are associated with higher out-of-pocket expenses for patients, which can lead to decreased access and adherence to treatment.

Indexed as

DermatologyMedicare Part DPrescription DrugsDrugs, GenericDrug UtilizationHumansUnited StatesDrugs, GenericPrescription DrugsBrandCostsDermatologyDrugGenericMedicarePrescriptionTrends

Identifiers

PMID36309878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.