Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309708›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2022

Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the decision making of patients in undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery.

Chiung-Chyi Shen, Rong-San Jiang, Men-Yin Yang, Weir-Chiang You, Ming-Hsi Sun, Meei-Ling Sheu, Liang-Yi Pan, Jason Sheehan, Hung-Chuan Pan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Increased time to surgery and worse perioperative outcome in benign brain tumor patients with COVID-19.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiung-Chyi Shen *Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Rong-San JiangDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Men-Yin Yang *Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Weir-Chiang YouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsi SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Meei-Ling SheuInstitute of Biomedical Science, National Chung-Hsin University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Liang-Yi PanFaculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jason SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Hung-Chuan PanDepartment of Medical Research and Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec.4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. hcpan2003@yahoo.com.tw.
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TWUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGamma knife radiosurgery (GK) is a commonly used approach for the treatment of intracranial lesions. Its radiation response is typically not immediate, but delayed. In this study, we analyzed cases from a prospectively collected database to assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the decision making in patients treated by gamma knife radiosurgery.

methodsFrom January 2019 to August 2021, 540 cases of intracranial lesions were treated by GK with 207 cases before COVID-19 pandemic as a control. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 333 cases were similarly treated on patients with or without the COVID-19 vaccination. All the GK treated parameters as well as time profile in the decision making were analyzed. The parameters included age, sex, characteristic of lesion, targeted volume, peripheral radiation dose, neurological status, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), time interval from MRI diagnosis to consultation, time interval from the approval to treatment, frequency of outpatient department (OPD) visit, and frequency of imaging follow-up.

resultsLonger time intervals from diagnosis to GK consultation and treatment were found in the pandemic group (36.8 ± 25.5/54.5 ± 27.6 days) compared with the pre-COVID control (17.1 ± 22.4/45.0 ± 28.0 days) or vaccination group (12.2 ± 7.1/29.6 ± 10.9 days) (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The fewer OPD visits and MRI examinations also showed the same trends. High proportion of neurological deficits were found in the pandemic group (65.4%) compared with the control (45.4%) or vaccination group (58.1%) (p < 0.001). The Charlson comorbidity in the pandemic group was 3.9 ± 3.3, the control group was 4.6 ± 3.2, and the vaccination group was 3.1 ± 3.1. There were similar inter-group difference (p < 0.001). In multiple variant analyses, longer time intervals from the diagnosis to consultation or treatment, OPD frequency and MRI examination were likely influenced by the status of the COVID-19 pandemic as they were alleviated by the vaccination.

conclusionsThe decision making in patients requiring gamma knife treatment was most likely influenced by the status of the COVID-19 pandemic, while vaccination appeared to attenuate their hesitant behaviors. Patients with pre-treatment neurological deficits and high co-morbidity undergoing the gamma knife treatment were less affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCOVID-19RadiosurgeryCOVID-19 VaccinesDecision MakingFollow-Up StudiesHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Decision makingGamma knifeRadiosurgeryVaccination

Identifiers

PMID36309708
PMCPMC9617744
OpenAlexW4307838317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.