Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309696›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2022

Pitfalls in methods to study colocalization of nanoparticles in mouse macrophage lysosomes.

Aura Maria Moreno-Echeverri, Eva Susnik, Dimitri Vanhecke, Patricia Taladriz-Blanco, Sandor Balog, Alke Petri-Fink, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aura Maria Moreno-Echeverri *Adolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Eva Susnik *Adolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Dimitri VanheckeAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Patricia Taladriz-BlancoInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Braga, Portugal.
Sandor BalogAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Alke Petri-FinkAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Barbara Rothen-RutishauserAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland. barbara.rothen@unifr.ch.
Adolphe Merkle Institute · CHInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory · PTUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

National Center of Competence in Research Bio-Inspired Materials, University of Fribourg 51NF40-182881Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_159847/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the field of nanoscience there is an increasing interest to follow dynamics of nanoparticles (NP) in cells with an emphasis on endo-lysosomal pathways and long-term NP fate. During our research on this topic, we encountered several pitfalls, which can bias the experimental outcome. We address some of these pitfalls and suggest possible solutions. The accuracy of fluorescence microscopy methods has an important role in obtaining insights into NP interactions with lysosomes at the single cell level including quantification of NP uptake in a specific cell type.

methodsHere we use J774A.1 cells as a model for professional phagocytes. We expose them to fluorescently-labelled amorphous silica NP with different sizes and quantify the colocalization of fluorescently-labelled NP with lysosomes over time. We focus on confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to obtain 3D spatial information and follow live cell imaging to study NP colocalization with lysosomes.

resultsWe evaluate different experimental parameters that can bias the colocalization coefficients (i.e., Pearson's and Manders'), such as the interference of phenol red in the cell culture medium with the fluorescence intensity and image post-processing (effect of spatial resolution, optical slice thickness, pixel saturation and bit depth). Additionally, we determine the correlation coefficients for NP entering the lysosomes under four different experimental set-ups. First, we found out that not only Pearson's, but also Manders' correlation coefficient should be considered in lysosome-NP colocalization studies; second, there is a difference in NP colocalization when using NP of different sizes and fluorescence dyes and last, the correlation coefficients might change depending on live-cell and fixed-cell imaging set-up.

conclusionsThe results summarize detailed steps and recommendations for the experimental design, staining, sample preparation and imaging to improve the reproducibility of colocalization studies between the NP and lysosomes.

Indexed as

LysosomesNanoparticlesAnimalsMacrophagesMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceReproducibility of ResultsColocalizationLysosomesLysoTracker probesMacrophagesNanoparticlesPitfalls

Identifiers

PMID36309696
PMCPMC9618187
OpenAlexW4307810527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.