Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309547›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A robust COVID-19 mortality prediction calculator based on Lymphocyte count, Urea, C-Reactive Protein, Age and Sex (LUCAS) with chest X-rays.

Surajit Ray, Abhirup Banerjee, Andrew Swift, Joseph W Fanstone, Michail Mamalakis, Bart Vorselaars, Craig Wilkie, Joby Cole, Louise S Mackenzie, Simonne Weeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Surajit RaySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Abhirup BanerjeeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Andrew SwiftDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Joseph W FanstoneBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, BN1 9PX, UK.
Michail MamalakisSchool of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, 211 Portobello, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.
Bart VorselaarsSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK.
Craig WilkieSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Joby ColeDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Louise S MackenzieSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, BN2 4AT, UK. l.mackenzie2@brighton.ac.uk.
Simonne WeeksSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, BN2 4AT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 205188/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been numerous risk tools developed to enable triaging of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with diverse levels of complexity. Here we presented a simplified risk-tool based on minimal parameters and chest X-ray (CXR) image data that predicts the survival of adult SARS-CoV-2 positive patients at hospital admission. We analysed the NCCID database of patient blood variables and CXR images from 19 hospitals across the UK using multivariable logistic regression. The initial dataset was non-randomly split between development and internal validation dataset with 1434 and 310 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, respectively. External validation of the final model was conducted on 741 Accident and Emergency (A&E) admissions with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection from a separate NHS Trust. The LUCAS mortality score included five strongest predictors (Lymphocyte count, Urea, C-reactive protein, Age, Sex), which are available at any point of care with rapid turnaround of results. Our simple multivariable logistic model showed high discrimination for fatal outcome with the area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) in development cohort 0.765 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.738-0.790), in internal validation cohort 0.744 (CI: 0.673-0.808), and in external validation cohort 0.752 (CI: 0.713-0.787). The discriminatory power of LUCAS increased slightly when including the CXR image data. LUCAS can be used to obtain valid predictions of mortality in patients within 60 days of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results into low, moderate, high, or very high risk of fatality.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultC-Reactive ProteinHumansLymphocyte CountRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2UreaX-RaysC-Reactive ProteinUrea

Identifiers

PMID36309547
PMCPMC9617052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.