Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309540›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2022

Scaffold-based bone tissue engineering in microgravity: potential, concerns and implications.

Federico Mochi, Elisa Scatena, Daniel Rodriguez, Maria-Pau Ginebra, Costantino Del Gaudio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cartilage organoids and osteoarthritis research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico Mochi *E. Amaldi Foundation, Via del Politecnico snc, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Elisa Scatena *E. Amaldi Foundation, Via del Politecnico snc, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Daniel RodriguezBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Av. Eduard Maristany 10, 08019, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6286-5200
Maria-Pau GinebraBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Av. Eduard Maristany 10, 08019, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-5621
Costantino Del GaudioE. Amaldi Foundation, Via del Politecnico snc, 00133, Rome, Italy. costantino.delgaudio@fondazioneamaldi.it.
Fondazione Politecnico di Milano · ITInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia · ESUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ES

Funding

European Space Agency (ESA) ESA CONTRACT NO. 4000134720 /21/NL/PA/pt
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of humanity's greatest challenges is space exploration, which requires an in-depth analysis of the data continuously collected as a necessary input to fill technological gaps and move forward in several research sectors. Focusing on space crew healthcare, a critical issue to be addressed is tissue regeneration in extreme conditions. In general, it represents one of the hottest and most compelling goals of the scientific community and the development of suitable therapeutic strategies for the space environment is an urgent need for the safe planning of future long-term manned space missions. Osteopenia is a commonly diagnosed disease in astronauts due to the physiological adaptation to altered gravity conditions. In order to find specific solutions to bone damage in a reduced gravity environment, bone tissue engineering is gaining a growing interest. With the aim to critically investigate this topic, the here presented review reports and discusses bone tissue engineering scenarios in microgravity, from scaffolding to bioreactors. The literature analysis allowed to underline several key points, such as the need for (i) biomimetic composite scaffolds to better mimic the natural microarchitecture of bone tissue, (ii) uniform simulated microgravity levels for standardized experimental protocols to expose biological materials to the same testing conditions, and (iii) improved access to real microgravity for scientific research projects, supported by the so-called democratization of space.

Identifiers

PMID36309540
PMCPMC9617896
OpenAlexW4307592572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.