Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309512›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1.

Zvi N Roth, Kendrick Kay, Elisha P Merriam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Orientation Maps in Mouse Superior Colliculus Explained by Population Model of Non-Orientation Selective Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Principles of intensive human neuroimaging.Trends in neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Expectation Cues and False Percepts Generate Stimulus-Specific Activity in Distinct Layers of the Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Texture Statistics Encoding Model Reveals Hierarchical Feature Selectivity across Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zvi N RothLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. zvi.roth@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-2173-1625
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Elisha P MerriamLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-566X
National Institute of Mental Health · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Multiple Scales of Stimulus Representation in the Human BrainZIAMH002966 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MERRIAM, ELISHA · 2017 to 2025
$10.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orientation selectivity in primate visual cortex is organized into cortical columns. Since cortical columns are at a finer spatial scale than the sampling resolution of standard BOLD fMRI measurements, analysis approaches have been proposed to peer past these spatial resolution limitations. It was recently found that these methods are predominantly sensitive to stimulus vignetting - a form of selectivity arising from an interaction of the oriented stimulus with the aperture edge. Beyond vignetting, it is not clear whether orientation-selective neural responses are detectable in BOLD measurements. Here, we leverage a dataset of visual cortical responses measured using high-field 7T fMRI. Fitting these responses using image-computable models, we compensate for vignetting and nonetheless find reliable tuning for orientation. Results further reveal a coarse-scale map of orientation preference that may constitute the neural basis for known perceptual anisotropies. These findings settle a long-standing debate in human neuroscience, and provide insights into functional organization principles of visual cortex.

Indexed as

Brain MappingVisual CortexAnimalsAnisotropyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36309512
PMCPMC9617970
OpenAlexW4307838306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.