Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309508›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2022

Multiple input algorithm-guided Deep Brain stimulation-programming for Parkinson's disease patients.

Eileen Gülke, León Juárez Paz, Heleen Scholtes, Christian Gerloff, Andrea A Kühn, Monika Pötter-Nerger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Navigating the Roadblocks to Clinical Implementation.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eileen GülkeDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1654-4443
León Juárez PazBoston Scientific, Valencia, CA, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1621-1318
Heleen ScholtesBoston Scientific, Valencia, CA, Spain.
Christian GerloffDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea A KühnDepartment of Neurology, Movement disorders & Neuromodulation section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-9060
Monika Pötter-NergerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. m.poetter-nerger@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-2147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) provide increased programming options with higher programming burden. Reducing the effort of DBS optimization requires novel programming strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a semi-automatic algorithm-guided-programming (AgP) approach to obtain beneficial stimulation settings for PD patients with directional DBS systems. The AgP evaluates iteratively the weighted combination of sensor and clinician assessed responses of multiple PD symptoms to suggested DBS settings until it converges to a final solution. Acute clinical effectiveness of AgP DBS settings and DBS settings that were found following a standard of care (SoC) procedure were compared in a randomized, crossover and double-blind fashion in 10 PD subjects from a single center. Compared to therapy absence, AgP and SoC DBS settings significantly improved (p = 0.002) total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III scores (median 69.8 interquartile range (IQR) 64.6|71.9% and 66.2 IQR 58.1|68.2%, respectively). Despite their similar clinical results, AgP and SoC DBS settings differed substantially. Per subject, AgP tested 37.0 IQR 34.0|37 settings before convergence, resulting in 1.7 IQR 1.6|2.0 h, which is comparable to previous reports. Although AgP long-term clinical results still need to be investigated, this approach constitutes an alternative for DBS programming and represents an important step for future closed-loop DBS optimization systems.

Identifiers

PMID36309508
PMCPMC9617933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.