Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36309483›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2022

Polygenic heterogeneity in antidepressant treatment and placebo response.

Anne Krogh Nøhr, Annika Forsingdal, Ida Moltke, Oliver D Howes, Morana Vitezic, Anders Albrechtsen, Maria Dalby

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Krogh NøhrThe Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Annika ForsingdalH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark. angf@lundbeck.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-4365
Ida MoltkeThe Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Oliver D HowesH. Lundbeck A/S, St Albans, UK.
Morana VitezicH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders AlbrechtsenThe Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Maria DalbyH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6018-3468
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_A656_5QD30_2135Medical Research Council MC_U120097115Medical Research Council MR/N027078/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 094849/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic architecture of antidepressant response is poorly understood. Polygenic risk scores (PRS), exploration of placebo response and the use of sub-scales might provide insights. Here, we investigate the association between PRSs for relevant complex traits and response to vortioxetine treatment and placebo using clinical scales, including sub-scales and self-reported assessments. We collected a clinical test sample of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients treated with vortioxetine (N = 907) or placebo (N = 455) from seven randomized, double-blind, clinical trials. In parallel, we obtained data from an observational web-based study of vortioxetine-treated patients (N = 642) with self-reported response. PRSs for antidepressant response, psychiatric disorders, and symptom traits were derived using summary statistics from well-powered genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Association tests were performed between the PRSs and treatment response in each of the two test samples and empirical p-values were evaluated. In the clinical test sample, no PRSs were significantly associated with response to vortioxetine treatment or placebo following Bonferroni correction. However, clinically assessed treatment response PRS was nominally associated with vortioxetine treatment and placebo response given by several secondary outcome scales (improvement on HAM-A, HAM-A Psychic Anxiety sub-scale, CPFQ & PDQ), (P ≤ 0.026). Further, higher subjective well-being PRS (P ≤ 0.033) and lower depression PRS (P = 0.01) were nominally associated with higher placebo response. In the self-reported test sample, higher schizophrenia PRS was significantly associated with poorer self-reported response (P = 0.0001). The identified PRSs explain a low proportion of the variance (1.2-5.3%) in placebo and treatment response. Although the results were limited, we believe that PRS associations bear unredeemed potential as a predictor for treatment response, as more well-powered and phenotypically similar GWAS bases become available.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAntidepressive AgentsDouble-Blind MethodGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMultifactorial InheritancePlacebo EffectTreatment OutcomeVortioxetineAntidepressive AgentsVortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID36309483
PMCPMC9617908
OpenAlexW4307813314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.