ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Clinicopathological Prognostic Factors Determining Outcomes of Treatment in Gastric Cancer Surgery.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASSOCIATION OF TUMOR DEPOSITS WITH TUMOR PATHOLOGY AND SURVIVAL IN GASTRIC CANCER: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- Clinical importance of E-cadherin deficiency in resectable gastric cancer: A nested case-control study.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Different Master Regulators Define Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer: Insights into Prognosis and Opportunities for Targeted Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Long-term outcome after perioperative chemotherapy and surgery for gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: what factors influence the prognosis?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025Observational
- Article
- Feasibility of a "Stomach-preserving Strategy" for Perforated Gastric Cancer in Patients With Distant Metastasis.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Body Mass Index (BMI) as a Prognostic Factor Influencing Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Resection Including Curative Gastrectomy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Impact of Clinicopathological Features on Gastric Cancer Stage According to TNM Classification.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe purpose of this study was to examine the impact of clinicopathological prognostic factors on tumor resectability, perioperative complications, and 5-year survival rates in patients with gastric cancer treated surgically. PATIENTS AND
methodsA cohort of 834 patients operated on for gastric cancer between 2007 and 2016 was analyzed.
resultsPatients over 70 years of age manifested a significantly higher rate of overall complications, systemic complications, surgical complications, perioperative mortality, and a worse 5-year survival. The diffuse type according to the Lauren classification was an independent prognostic factor for perioperative mortality. TNM stage significantly influenced resectability and 5-year survival rates. Furthermore, the presence of distant metastases (M1 stage) significantly increased the rates of overall complications, systemic complications, and perioperative mortality.
conclusionAlthough TNM stage was the most important prognostic factor for resectability, perioperative complications and 5-year survival, other clinicopathological prognostic factors, such as age, and Lauren type also significantly affected treatment outcomes in gastric cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.