ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors of Sinonasal Rhabdomyosarcoma.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of survival among children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma treated in a single resource-limited centre -Uganda.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Primary Liver Rhabdomyosarcoma with Burnt-out Paravertebral Disease.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- CT and MR imaging features of soft tissue rhabdoid tumor: compared with rhabdomyosarcoma in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitor Suppresses the Local Progression of Rhabdomyosarcoma With PDX Models.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimSinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare soft tissue malignancy. Due to the limited cases, the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors are still not well understood. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective review included eight patients with sinonasal RMS at our institution between 2004 and 2020. Patient demographics, tumor features, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) stage and clinical group, treatment strategy, and survival rates were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were performed to analyze the possible prognostic factors.
resultsWe observed a predominance of male sex and alveolar-type tumor in sinonasal RMS. Nasal obstructions and neck masses were the most common symptoms. Patients with pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels >400 U/l and negative immunohistochemical staining for desmin or MyoD1 had lower survival rates.
conclusionIn patients with sinonasal RMS, pretreatment LDH levels >400 U/l and negative immunohistochemical staining for desmin or MyoD1 may suggest a poor prognosis. These factors can not only contribute to the prediction of prognosis in patients with sinonasal RMS but also facilitate the design of more appropriate treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.