Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36308630›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2022

Tumor-derived exosomal non-coding RNAs as diagnostic biomarkers in cancer.

Nasim Ebrahimi, Ferdos Faghihkhorasani, Siavash Seifollahy Fakhr, Parichehr Roozbahani Moghaddam, Elnaz Yazdani, Zahra Kheradmand, Fatemeh Rezaei-Tazangi, Samaneh Adelian, Halimeh Mobarak, Michael R Hamblin and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. An Overview of Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Nasim EbrahimiGenetics Division, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Ferdos FaghihkhorasaniMedical Campus, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Siavash Seifollahy FakhrDivision of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology, Campus, Hamar, Norway.
Parichehr Roozbahani MoghaddamDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Science, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Mazandaran, Iran.
Elnaz YazdaniDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Zahra KheradmandDepartment of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University Maragheh Branch, Maragheh, Iran.
Fatemeh Rezaei-TazangiDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Samaneh AdelianCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Halimeh MobarakClinical Pathologist, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Michael R HamblinLaser Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein, 2028, South Africa. labhamblin@gmail.com.
Amir Reza ArefDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. amir@xspherabio.com.
University of Isfahan · IRFasa University of Medical Sciences · IRHarvard University · USIslamic Azad University, Tehran · IRIslamic Azad University Tonekabon · IRShahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Johannesburg · ZAXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost all clinical oncologists agree that the discovery of reliable, accessible, and non-invasive biomarkers is necessary to decrease cancer mortality. It is possible to employ reliable biomarkers to diagnose cancer in the early stages, predict the patient prognosis, follow up the response to treatment, and estimate the risk of disease recurrence with high sensitivity and specificity. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), especially exosomes, have been the focus of translational research to develop such biomarkers over the past decade. The abundance and distribution of exosomes in bodily fluids, including serum, saliva, and urine, as well as their ability to transport various biomolecules (nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids) derived from their parent cells, make exosomes reliable, accessible, and potent biomarkers for diagnosis and follow-up of solid and hematopoietic tumors. In addition, exosomes play a vital role in various cellular processes, including tumor progression, by participating in intercellular communication. Although these advantages underline the high potential of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers, the lack of standardized effective methods for their isolation, identification, and precise characterization makes their application challenging in clinical settings. We discuss the importance of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in cellular processes, and the role of tumor-derived exosomes containing ncRNAs as potential biomarkers in several types of cancer. In addition, the advantages and challenges of these studies for translation into clinical applications are covered.

Indexed as

ExosomesExtracellular VesiclesNeoplasmsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorHumansRNA, UntranslatedBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorRNA, UntranslatedCancer prognosisDiagnostic biomarkersEarly diagnosisNon-coding RNAsTumor-derived exosomes

Identifiers

PMID36308630
PMCPMC11802992
OpenAlexW4307838203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.