ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Improving quality of life post-tumor craniotomy using personalized, parcel-guided TMS: safety and proof of concept.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in Somatomotor Network Connectivity Differentiate Better Versus Worse Recovery of Hand Dexterity After Brain Tumor Surgery: A Cohort Study.Neural plasticity · 2026Article
- Learning from missteps: Potential of transcranial electrical stimulation in neuropsychological rehabilitation.Journal of neuropsychology · 2025Review
- Improvement of Chronic Tinnitus Following Personalized, Parcel-guided Accelerated rTMS: Feasibility in a Retrospective Case Series.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Evaluating the safety profile of connectome-based repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Article
- Interventional neurorehabilitation for glioma patients: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Review
- Improvements in Sleep Quality in Patients With Major Depressive and Generalized Anxiety Disorders Treated With Individualized, Parcel-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurology: opportunities, challenges, and policy implications.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly postcardiac surgery patients: progress in rehabilitation application research.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Review
- Personalized, parcel-guided rTMS for the treatment of major depressive disorder: Safety and proof of concept.Brain and behavior · 2023Review
- Large-scale brain networks and intra-axial tumor surgery: a narrative review of functional mapping techniques, critical needs, and scientific opportunities.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDeficits in neuro-cognitive function are not uncommon for patients who have undergone surgical removal of brain tumors. Our goal is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a non-invasive tool for the treatment of neuro-cognitive dysfunctions following craniotomy.
methodsWe present a retrospective review of individualized rTMS in twelve patients from Cingulum Health from December 2019 to July 2021 who presented with neuro-cognitive deficits following craniotomy. Multiple cortical targets were selected based on the patient's neurological disorder, associated networks, and anomalies in the functional connectivity of the brain as determined by machine-learning. TMS treatment was performed for five consecutive days. EuroQol quality of life (EQ-5D), functional extremity scales, and neuropsychiatric questionnaires related to the patient's deficit were assessed prior to, after, and during two-month follow-up of rTMS treatment.
resultsNine patients had unilateral functional deficits in either upper, lower, or both limbs. One patient reported post-operative depression, another experienced short term memory difficulties, and a third reported hypobulia. All twelve patients reported significantly improved EQ5D after rTMS treatment and during follow-up. More than half of the patients with lower and upper functional deficits had a 9-point improvement during follow-up. In the patient who developed depression, an 88% reduction in depressive symptoms based on the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) was observed during follow-up. No adverse events, such as seizures, occurred.
conclusionThe personalized functional connectivity approach to rTMS treatment may be effective and safe for patients with post-craniotomy neuro-cognitive dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.