ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022
The data and the reality: urine cultures and emergency medicine physicians.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergency medicine physicians treating urine cultures when it is not clear they should.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for positive urine culture and antimicrobial resistance in suspected UTI after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Laboratory Tests, Bacterial Resistance, and Treatment Options in Adult Patients Hospitalized with a Suspected Urinary Tract Infection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe IDSA has published guidelines for the treatment of urinary tract infections, recommending limiting treatment to symptomatic patients and pregnant females. Our objective is to elucidate current practice patterns among emergency physicians (EPs) in treating positive urine cultures in various clinical situations.
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design utilizing a questionnaire addressing nine common scenarios encountered by EPs in the follow-up of a positive urine culture. The questionnaire was conducted using RedCap and distributed via email to current and former physicians and residents across our hospital network. Demographic information included years of training and practice setting. For each of nine clinical scenarios, Physicians were asked if they would treat with antibiotics. Results were then analyzed by tabulating percentage of responses and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsOf 120 respondents, 40.8% worked in academic centers with emergency medicine residencies, 37.5% in large community hospitals, and 20.67% in small community hospitals. Responses came from 14 residents, 33 attendings < 5 years out of training, 23 attendings 5-9 years out of training, 37 attendings 10-20 years out of training, and 13 attendings > 20 beyond training. Asymptomatic young women were treated by 34.2% (95% CI 25.91-43.46%) while asymptomatic elderly women were treated by 50% (95% CI 40.79-59.21%) of EPs. All EPs (95% CI 96.13-100%) chose to treat a symptomatic male and 99.2% (95% CI 94.77-99.96%) chose to treat an asymptomatic pregnant female. Elderly females after a fall were treated by 63.3% (95% CI 54-71.8%) of EPs while elderly males with confusion and a fall were treated by 96.7% (95% CI 91.18-98.93%). Asymptomatic males with a chronic Foley catheter were treated by 28.2% (95% CI 20.67-37.4%) of EPs and 46.7% (95%CI 37.59-55.97%) would treat an asymptomatic middle-aged female with diabetes. Finally, 92.5% (95% CI 85.85-96.3%) of EPs chose to treat an asymptomatic kidney transplant patient.
conclusionEPs in varied training stages and practice settings have significant practice variation in the treatment of positive urine cultures, particularly in the geriatric population, often prescribing antibiotics to patients where clear, specific and data-driven IDSA guidelines suggest treatment is unnecessary and potentially harmful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.