ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of exosomes in castration-resistant prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur study was to determine whether immediate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiotherapy (RT) extends survival in men with node-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) compared with those who received ADT alone.
methodsA total of 99 consecutive patients with pathological positive lymph nodes (pN1) PCa were included in this study to receive immediate ADT plus RT (n = 70) or to receive immediate ADT alone (n = 29). The primary endpoint was castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) free survival; the secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival. Cox regression was used to assess the independent risk factors for CRPC.
resultsThe median follow-up time was 34.0 (24.8, 47.8) months and 34.25 (23.0, 49.0) months, respectively, in the ADT + RT group and ADT-alone group. The 5-year CRPC-free survival rate was 79.5% and 58.3%, respectively, in the ADT + RT group and ADT-alone group (p = 0.308). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate was 71.4% and 38.8, respectively, in the ADT + RT group and ADT-alone group (p = 0.478). Compared with ADT-alone group, we saw a modest, but no significant improvement in CRPC-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival in ADT + RT group. The results of Cox regression showed that positive lymph nodes ≥ 4 was an independent risk factor for CRPC (p = 0.041).
conclusionsWe found that immediate ADT plus RT compared to ADT alone did not improve CRPC-free and metastasis-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression analyses also indicated that patients with positive lymph nodes < 4 may benefits from ADT plus RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.