Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36308520›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2023

Impacts of anterior-posterior jaw disproportions on speech of dentofacial disharmony patients.

Steven Oliver, Mary Morgan Bitler Keyser, Samantha Jhingree, Clare Bocklage, Hillary Lathrop, Natalie Giduz, Kevin Moss, George Blakey, Raymond White, Timothy Turvey and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Multitaper Spectrum Analysis of Consonants Produced by Patients With Dentofacial Disharmonies.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven OliverDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mary Morgan Bitler KeyserDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Samantha JhingreeDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Clare BocklageDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hillary LathropDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Natalie GiduzDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kevin MossDivision of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
George BlakeyDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Oral Surgery Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Raymond WhiteDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Oral Surgery Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Timothy TurveyDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Oral Surgery Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jeff MielkeNorth Carolina State University, English Department, Tompkins Hall, Raleigh, NC, USA.
David ZajacDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Speech Pathology Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Laura Anne JacoxDivision of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Orthodontics Group, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1923-6825
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
Orthognathic speech pathology: Understanding how jaw disharmonies and their surgical correction influence speechK08DE030235 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JACOX, LAURA ANNE · 2021 to 2025
$889k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE030235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesArticulation problems impact communication, development, and quality of life, and are diagnosed in 73-87% of patients with Class II Dentofacial Disharmony (DFD). We evaluated whether differences exist in stop (/t/ or/k/), fricative (/s/ or/ʃ/), and affricate (/tʃ/) consonant sounds of Class II DFD subjects, and whether extent of malocclusion correlates with severity of speech distortion. We hypothesized that Class II patients display milder distortions than Class III and anterior open bite (AOB), as Class II patients can posture into a Class I occlusion. MATERIALS/

methodsAudio and orthodontic records were collected from DFD patients (N = 53-Class II, 102-Class III, 72-Controls) who were pursuing orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A speech pathologist perceptually scored speech. Acoustic differences in recordings were measured using Spectral Moment Analysis.

resultsWhen Class II subjects were compared to controls, significant differences were found for the centroid frequency (M1) of the /s/ sound and the spectral spread (M2) of /t/, /tʃ/, and /s/ sounds, with pairwise significance for controls relative to Class II AOB and all Class II subjects. Class II AOB subjects had higher M1 and M2 values than patients with Class II closed bites and Class I controls for most sounds. When comparing across anterior-posterior (AP) groups, differences exist between controls, Class II and III DFD subjects for M1 of /t/, /tʃ/, and/ʃ/ and M2 for /t/, /tʃ/, /s/, and /ʃ/ sounds. Using linear regression, correlations between Class II and III severity and spectral measures were found for /t/ and /tʃ/ sounds. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Class II and III patients have a higher prevalence of qualitative distortions and spectral changes in consonants compared to controls, but Class II spectral shifts are smaller and affect fewer sounds than in Class III and AOB cohorts. Linear correlations between AP discrepancy and spectral change suggest causation and that treatment may improve articulation problems.

Indexed as

MalocclusionMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIOpen BiteHumansQuality of LifeSpeechSpeech Disorders

Identifiers

PMID36308520
PMCPMC9912703
OpenAlexW4307583328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.