ArticleDevelopment, growth & differentiation2022
Differential contribution of nuclear size scaling mechanisms between Xenopus species.
Article in Development, growth & differentiation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between female pronuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and number of chromosomes in mouse zygotic stage: implications for aneuploidy assessment in ART.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Differential contribution of nuclear size scaling mechanisms between Xenopus species.Development, growth & differentiation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Size of the nucleus, a membrane-bound organelle for DNA replication and transcription in eukaryotic cells, varies to adapt nuclear functions to the surrounding environment. Nuclear size strongly correlates with cytoplasmic size and genomic content. Previous studies using Xenopus laevis have unraveled two modes, cytoplasmic and chromatin-based mechanisms, for controlling nuclear size. However, owing to limited comparative analyses of the mechanisms among eukaryotic species, the contribution of each mechanism in controlling nuclear size has not been comprehensively elucidated. Here, we compared the relative contribution utilizing a cell-free reconstruction system from the cytoplasmic extract of unfertilized eggs of Xenopus tropicalis to that of the sister species X. laevis. In this system, interphase nuclei were reconstructed in vitro from sperm chromatin and increased in size throughout the incubation period. Using extracts from X. tropicalis, growth rate of the reconstructed nuclei was decreased by obstructing the effective cytoplasmic space, decreasing DNA quantity, or inhibiting molecules involved in various cytoplasmic mechanisms. Although these features are qualitatively identical to that shown by the extract of X. laevis, the sensitivities of experimental manipulation for each cellular parameter were different between the extracts from two Xenopus species. These quantitative differences implied that the contribution of each mode to expansion of the nuclear envelope is coordinated in a species-specific manner, which sets the species-specific nuclear size for in vivo physiological function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.