ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022
Survival Analysis and Clinical Outcomes between Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Carboplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced-stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Single-center Cohort Study.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application and drug resistance mechanism of gemcitabine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalliative chemotherapy using platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was recommended as one of the standard treatments in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative EGFR mutation. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) and those treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine (CG).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing PC and CG at Hatyai Hospital between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was survival analysis, and the secondary outcome was chemotherapy-related adverse events, and the rate and reason for stopping chemotherapy.
resultThe median overall survivals of both groups was comparable (9.0 months for the PC group and 9.6 months for the CG group; log-rank, p=0.287). The CG group had a higher incidence of adverse events (89.7% vs. 77.9%, p=0.010) and tended to have a lower rate of chemotherapy discontinuation (29.6% vs. 41.2%, p=0.080) than the PC group. In the multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR]=0.351; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.158-0.780; p=0.010) and higher performance status (OR=76.374; 95%CI, 32.533-179.295; p<0.001) were independent predictive factors for stopping chemotherapy. In the proportional hazards model, the factors associated with decreased survival included higher performance status (hazard ratio [HR]=1.939; 95%CI, 1.388-2.709; P<0.001) and discontinuation of chemotherapy (HR=2.572; 95%CI, 1.792-3.691; p=<0.001).
conclusionThese two platinum-based regimens had comparable effects on overall survival. The CG group had a higher incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events, while the PC group had a marginally significantly higher rate of stopping chemotherapy from unacceptable adverse events and deterioration of patients' clinical status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.