ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022
Efficacy of Short Hydration for Intermediate to High-Dose Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Outpatients: SHORTCIS Trial.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydration Methods for Cisplatin Containing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.The oncologist · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSupporting data exists concerning short hydration to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. However, only a few studies exist. Further, data remains limited, comprising mostly retrospective data. Therefore, the study would like to evaluate the efficacy of short hydration using a prospective cohort study. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a prospective cohort non-randomized controlled study in patients receiving intermediate to high doses of cisplatin. Short hydration was set as the intervention arm, while conventional hydration was set as the controlled arm. The consecutive estimates glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were compared at baseline, Week 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12, and Week 15 for both groups by using multilevel regression analysis with the random-effects model with double adjustment (propensity score and confounding adjustment) was used. The trial was registered with the Thai Registry of Clinical Trials, SHORTCIS ThaiClinicalTrials.org, number TCTR20210128002.
results30 patients were registered. 14 were assigned to a short hydration group, while 16 were assigned to a conventional hydration group. The levels of consecutive eGFR of the group receiving short hydration were stable (regression coefficients 0.05), while the levels of consecutive eGFR of the group receiving conventional hydration were declined (regression coefficients -1.94). The multilevel regression analysis of consecutive eGFR between conventional group and short hydration group when adjusted for random-effects parameters and double adjustment were significantly different (p-value = 0.001). When analyzing the relationship of received short hydration, it could significantly reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity as well, i.e. acute kidney injury (odds ratio 0.06, 95%CI 0.003, 0.990, p-value 0.049).
conclusionShort hydration was more efficient for preventing nephrotoxicity than conventional hydration protocols in patients receiving intermediate to high doses of cisplatin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.