Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Evaluation of striate keratopathy after manual small-incision cataract surgery and its final outcomes in a tertiary hospital.
Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the demographic profile, contributing and precipitating factors, the severity of striate keratopathy and its relation with endothelial cell count, and evaluate the final treatment outcome of striate keratopathy. Methods: This observational: analytical cohort study was conducted on 75 patients developing striate keratopathy after MSICS in the immediate postoperative period. Demographic profile, preoperative risk factors, and intraoperative complications were evaluated retrospectively. Postoperatively, slit-lamp grading of striate keratopathy was done, and specular microscopy of both eyes was taken. Treatment of striate keratopathy was initiated, and patients were followed up for 6 to 10 weeks for improvement. Results: Striate keratopathy was most commonly associated with surgeries performed by resident surgeons (92%), longer duration of surgery, associated predisposing factors, and intraoperative or postoperative complications. On postoperative day 1, the majority of patients had moderate and severe striate keratopathy (66% and 32%, respectively). It was associated with significant endothelial cell loss (ECL) at the final follow-up (P = 0.0016). Striate keratopathy resolved in 97.3% of patients, irrespective of the treatment with hypertonic saline. At 6 to 10 weeks, 92% of patients achieved a BCVA of ≥6/9. Conclusion: A careful preoperative evaluation, adequate training of resident surgeons, meticulous surgical technique, and prompt management of postoperative complications can lead to a decrease in the incidence of striate keratopathy in the majority of cases. The use of hypertonic saline eye drops does not change the final outcome, and most cases resolve spontaneously during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.