Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Manual small-incision cataract surgery under topical anesthesia for post-uveitis complicated cataract.
Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of intraoperative 3 mg triamcinolone acetonide injection on visual rehabilitation and inflammation control in uveitic cataract patients undergoing small-incision cataract surgery.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Advances in the management of uveitic cataract: current strategies and emerging perspectives.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cataract development is a common sequelae associated with uveitis. Despite phacoemulsification being the popular method of cataract surgery today, manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) may still be a safe and effective alternative because of several inherent benefits. There is not much literature and studies on the efficacy and safety of MSICS under topical anesthesia in complicated cataract in patients with uveitis. We aimed to study the safety and visual outcome of MSICS under topical anesthesia for post uveitis complicated cataract. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. The electronic medical records of adult patients who underwent MSICS under topical anesthesia for post uveitis cataract were reviewed. The records were reviewed and analyzed for preoperative clinical characteristics and visual acuity, intraoperative complications and postoperative visual acuity, and complications. Results: A total of 71 eyes of 59 patients were taken for final analysis. The average age of patients was 59.9 years. There was improvement in the best corrected visual acuity by 0.7 logMAR (P value <0.0001). Average follow-up period was 9.8 months. The mean gain in visual acuity in eyes that received preoperative steroids was 0.6 logMAR compared to the eyes that did not receive steroids (0.71 logMAR). The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.407). Complications seen during long-term follow-up were recurrence (15.5%), cystoid macular edema (7%), Epiretinal membrane (8.5%), and posterior capsular opacification (5.5%). Conclusion: With proper technique and precautions, MSICS can be safely and comfortably performed under topical anesthesia even in complicated cataracts with excellent visual and safety outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.