Trial reportIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Corneal endothelial changes following cataract surgery in hard nuclear cataract: Randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification to manual small-incision cataract surgery.
Trial report in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Eight-Chop Technique in Nonagenarian Patients: Real-World Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Manual small incision cataract surgery: An ergonomic solution to tackle cataract backlog and challenging situations.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Cataract Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome Using the Eight-Chop Technique.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Minimizing Endothelial Cell Loss in Hard Nucleus Cataract Surgery: Efficacy of the Eight-Chop Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Subnuclear Phacoemulsification to Reduce Corneal Injury in Nuclear Cataract Surgery: Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Review
- Commentary: Endotheial cell damage during cataract surgery: choosing the best technique.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Research progress on the impact of cataract surgery on corneal endothelial cells.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare endothelial cell changes in phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in patients with uncomplicated senile cataracts. Methods: This was a prospective: , tertiary care hospital-based, randomized, double-blinded interventional study. In total, 152 patients with an uncomplicated senile cataract of nuclear grade III and above were recruited. Exclusion criteria included patients with preoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) less than 1500 cells/mm Results: Patients were randomized into two interventional groups-MSICS and phacoemulsification. Factors associated with significant drop in postoperative ECD following phacoemulsification were patients with advanced age (P = 0.01), higher grades of cataract (P = 0.01), and longer effective phacoemulsification time (P = 0.007). Shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD) was strongly associated with greater ECD loss in both groups (P < 0.0001). A threshold value of 2.86 mm of ACD was defined for minimal endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification. CCT was observed to slightly increase postoperatively in both groups but was insignificant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both MSICS and phacoemulsification have similar postoperative visual outcomes. An increase in postoperative CCT is insignificant following surgery. Greater postoperative ECD loss is associated with phacoemulsification with advanced age, hard nuclear cataracts, and longer effective phacoemulsification time. ACD can be used as an essential parameter preoperatively to determine the choice of surgical technique between MSICS and phacoemulsification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.