Trial reportIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Evaluation of cautery in manual small-incision cataract surgery.
Trial report in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manual small incision cataract surgery: An ergonomic solution to tackle cataract backlog and challenging situations.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography assessment of limbal vasculature changes after sclerocorneal vs. corneal cataract incisions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of scleral cautery on limbal vasculature after cataract surgery assessed using optical coherence tomography angiography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) has a major role in tackling cataract blindness in our country. Cauterization of sclera is one of the important steps performed in MSICS to have bloodless field during surgery. Only few studies have addressed the effect of cautery on post-operative astigmatism. The present study is designed to evaluate the effect of cautery on surgically induced astigmatism in Indian patients. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomized trial conducted in a tertiary health care institution over a period of 2 years. A total of 150 eyes were randomized into two groups. The study group (Group 1, n = 75) underwent MSICS with cauterization using wetfield bipolar cautery with 4 amperes power. In the control group (Group 2, n = 75), no cauterization was performed. Surgically induced astigmatism was calculated using Naesers polar value method and compared between these two groups up to 60 days post-operatively. Results: Data from 150 eyes were available for evaluation. The net post-operative astigmatic value was 1.01 ± 0.21, 1.04 ± 0.19, and 1.03 ± 0.22 D on the 1 Conclusion: The results of this study show that the use of cautery in MSICS is not associated with a higher surgically induced post-operative astigmatism. The magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism decreases with time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.