Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36308100›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Complications of manual small-incision cataract surgery.

Ruchi Goel, Shalin Shah, Krishan Pal Singh Malik, Ruchita Sontakke, Priyanka Golhait, Tanvi Gaonker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruchi GoelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Shalin ShahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Krishan Pal Singh MalikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Clinic, New Delhi, India.
Ruchita SontakkeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Priyanka GolhaitDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Tanvi GaonkerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is instrumental in tackling cataract-induced blindness in developing countries, especially with a sizeable proportion being hard brunescent cataracts. MSICS has a unique set of complications related to wound construction, the creation of the capsular opening, and the technique of nuclear delivery. A poorly constructed sclero-corneal tunnel or a small capsulorhexis hampers the nuclear extraction, and the extensive intracameral maneuvers increase the chances of postoperative corneal edema and iritis. Though MSICS has been shown to have universal applicability, producing replicable visual outcomes requires a significant learning curve. This article reviews the relevant published literature on complications of MSICS utilizing the databases of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionLens, CrystallineHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPostoperative ComplicationsVisual AcuityComplicationsintraoperativeMSICSpostoperative

Identifiers

PMID36308100
PMCPMC9907237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.