Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36308095›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Evolution of manual small-incision cataract surgery from 8 mm to 2 mm - A comprehensive review.

Bharat Gurnani, Deepak Mishra, Kirandeep Kaur, Aarti Heda, Amulya Sahu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bharat GurnaniConsultant Cataract, Cornea and Refractive Services, Dr. Om Parkash Eye Institute, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Deepak MishraAssociate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Kirandeep KaurConsultant Cataract, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Services, Dr. Om Parkash Eye Institute, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Aarti HedaConsultant Glaucoma, National Institute of Ophthalmology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amulya SahuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sahu Eye Hospital and Kamal Nethralay Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataract is the most common cause of reversible blindness worldwide, accounting for approximately 50% of blindness worldwide. Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure performed in routine ophthalmic practice. It has undergone tremendous evolution, and the incision size has progressively reduced from 10-12 mm in extracapsular cataract surgery (ECCE) to 6-8 mm for manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and 2.2-2.8 mm in phacoemulsification. In a developing country like India, with a massive backlog of cataract, everyone cannot afford private surgery like phacoemulsification. Moreover, annual maintenance of the machine, cost of foldable IOLs, need for greater skill, learning curve, and difficulty in performing the surgery in mature and brown cataracts are other barriers. Due to these factors, MSICS is the surgery of choice in the developing world, with profound societal and economic benefits and similar visual recovery compared to phacoemulsification. During the last two decades, MSICS gained popularity in developing countries and has undergone tremendous advances. This article aims to review the various techniques of MSICS and how the surgery has evolved over the years, particularly focusing on the current technique of 2-mm MSICS.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionPhacoemulsificationBlindnessHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularBlindnesscataractextra capsular cataract surgerymanual small-incision cataract surgeryphacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID36308095
PMCPMC9907246
OpenAlexW4307842295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.