Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307994›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2022

Evaluation of family history in individuals with heterozygous BRCA pathogenic variants diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer in a single center in Italy.

Serena Negri, Elena De Ponti, Federica Paola Sina, Elena Sala, Cristina Dell'Oro, Gaia Roversi, Sara Lazzarin, Martina Delle Marchette, Alesssandra Inzoli, Claudia Toso and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Serena NegriClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Elena De PontiDepartment of Physical Medicine, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Federica Paola SinaUOC Gynecologic Surgery, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Elena SalaUO Medical Genetics, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Cristina Dell'OroClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gaia RoversiUO Medical Genetics, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Sara LazzarinClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Martina Delle MarchetteClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Alesssandra InzoliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7532-3267
Claudia TosoUOC Gestione Sanitaria delle Convenzioni, ATS Brianza, Lecco, Italy.
Simona FumagalliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Maria CampanellaaBRCAdabra ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Joanne KotsopoulosWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert FruscioClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5688-2194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are responsible for 5% of breast cancer (BC) and 10-15% of ovarian cancer (EOC). The presence of a germline mutation and therefore the identification of subjects at high risk of developing cancer should ideally precede the onset of the disease, so that appropriate surveillance and risk-reducing treatments can be proposed. In this study, we revisited the family history (FH) of women who tested positive for BRCA mutations after being diagnosed with BC or EOC.

methodsThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®), and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) guidelines were applied to the FH of 157 women who were referred to San Gerardo Hospital for genetic counseling.

resultsAlmost 85% of women had an FH of BRCA-related cancer. 63.7% and 52.2% of women could have undergone genetic testing according to NCCN and AIOM testing criteria (p < .05) before tumor diagnosis. An FH of EOC was the most frequent NCCN criterion, followed by BC diagnosed <45 years old. Sixty-five percent of deceased women could have undergone genetic testing before developing cancer.

conclusionsFH is a powerful tool to identify high-risk individuals eligible for genetic counseling and testing. Testing of healthy individuals should be considered when an appropriately affected family member is unavailable for testing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedMutationAIOMBRCA1/2 mutationsfamily historygenetic testingNCCN

Identifiers

PMID36307994
PMCPMC9747548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.