Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36307861›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Seasonal fluctuations of Babesia bigemina and Rhipicephalus microplus in Brangus and Nellore cattle reared in the Cerrado biome, Brazil.

Kauê Rodriguez Martins, Marcos Valério Garcia, Paulino Bonatte-Junior, Pâmella Oliveira Duarte, Barbara Guimarães Csordas, Leandro de Oliveira Souza Higa, Namor Pinheiro Zimmermann, Jacqueline Cavalcante Barros, Renato Andreotti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kauê Rodriguez MartinsPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, 79070-900, Brazil.
Marcos Valério GarciaEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Paulino Bonatte-JuniorEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Pâmella Oliveira DuarteEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Barbara Guimarães CsordasEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Leandro de Oliveira Souza HigaEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Namor Pinheiro ZimmermannEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Jacqueline Cavalcante BarrosEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil.
Renato AndreottiEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Vila Popular, Avenida Radio Maia, 830., Campo Grande, MS, 79106-550, Brazil. renato.andreotti@embrapa.br.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Ixodida: Ixodidae, Canestrini, 1888) causes substantial economic and health losses in cattle production and is the main vector of Babesia bigemina (Piroplasmidae: Babesidae, Smith & Kilborne, 1893). Babesia bigemina is responsible for a tick-borne disease known as babesiosis that can cause hemolytic anemia, fever and death. In the study reported here, we investigated the relationship between the number of ticks per animal and the number of B. bigemina cytochrome b gene (cbisg) copies in the blood of Brangus and Nellore cattle reared without acaricidal treatment in the Brazilian Cerrado biome over a 1-year period.

methodsTicks on 19 animals (9 Brangus and 10 Nellore cattle) were counted every 18 days, and blood was collected every 36 days for 12 months. Serological samples were analyzed with an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and genomic DNA was analyzed by conventional PCR and quantitative PCR. The PCR products were sequenced by the Sanger method.

resultsThe Brangus and Nellore breeds showed similar weight development and no clinical signs of babesiosis. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the breeds were observed for the number of ticks and the number of B. bigemina cbisg gene copies.

conclusionsNo correlation between the number of ticks and the number of circulating copies of cbisg was observed, although Nellore cattle presented with fewer ticks than Brangus cattle and the number of cbisg copies was higher for Nellore cattle than for Brangus cattle.

Indexed as

BabesiaBabesiosisCattle DiseasesRhipicephalusAnimalsBrazilCattleEcosystemReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSeasonsBabesiosisBeef cattleBovineTick-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID36307861
PMCPMC9617377
OpenAlexW4307711607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.